Singapore lets the parties choose what the applicable law of their contract will be. It is therefore possible to agree that a foreign law applies to your agreement in Singapore, but this is not advisable. Singapore does not allow you to choose where you will negotiate your contractual dispute. A contract that governs a transaction in Singapore must be negotiated in Singapore. Since Singapore`s judges and mediators are most familiar with the law of their country, it makes sense to use Singapore as a legal choice for contracts related to your business activities in Singapore. Given the advantages of Singapore`s legislation, it may be useful for you to use Singapore as an applicable law for your contracts, even outside singapore. 15.8.5 The organization not mentioned has been justified on the basis of commercial comfort. Often, people act for someone else without revealing this fact. This is not because they are trying to commit fraud, but simply because the existence and identity of the payer often does not matter to the other party, especially for transactions relating to the sale and purchase of goods. It may also be that the agent sometimes acts on his own behalf and sometimes for others, and it is uncomfortable to separate these different transactions.
In addition, an agent must not reveal that he is acting for someone else because he does not want the other party to go directly to the sponsor and cut up the agent. Or maybe a sponsor doesn`t want the market to know what they`re doing for good business reasons, and so they use an agent and tell the agent to behave as if the agent is only acting for himself. The most controversial issue in this case before the High Court was the interaction between the Agency`s laws and competition. Persons who act on behalf of other persons who have such power are considered agents, and the legal effect of such acts of agents is that the person for whom they act – the sponsor – may be bound to such acts and has made legal commitments to the third party relating to the agents. An offence does not always entail liability. The parties may be exempted from a contract by agreement, frustration, error, misrepresentation, coercion, unlawful influence, impitoyability or illegality. First, the conditions for the purchase of the goods (as well as the conditions for the provision of related services, if any) that are to be marketed under the agreement – the terms are often standard, at least between the manufacturer and the distributor. . .